Prompt Library: Instructor Grading Rubric Creator

Grading Rubric Prompt

Please create a grading rubric for the attached assignment: Taking a Stand: Developing a Clear, Evidence-Based Argument.

 

Microsoft Copilot Response

Based on the assignment details in the document, here is a grading rubric for the “Taking a Stand: Developing a Clear, Evidence-Based Argument” essay:

Argumentative Essay Grading Rubric

CriteriaExcellent (A)Good (B)Satisfactory (C)Needs Improvement (D/F)Weight
Thesis StatementClear, specific, and strongly articulated; effectively guides the essayClear and relevant, but could be more specific or assertivePresent but vague or somewhat unclearMissing or very unclear20%
Use of Evidence & SupportIntegrates at least 3 scholarly sources effectively; evidence is well-chosen and clearly supports claimsUses 3 scholarly sources; evidence generally supports claimsUses fewer than 3 scholarly sources or relies on weak evidenceLacks credible evidence or misuses sources25%
Organization & CoherenceLogical structure with clear transitions; each paragraph supports the thesisMostly logical structure; some transitions may be weakOrganization is inconsistent; some paragraphs may lack focusPoorly organized; difficult to follow20%
Engagement with CounterargumentsThoughtfully addresses opposing views and responds effectivelyAddresses counterarguments but response may be underdevelopedMentions opposing views but lacks depthIgnores or misrepresents counterarguments10%
Grammar, Style, & MechanicsVirtually no errors; writing is polished and engagingMinor errors that do not impede understandingNoticeable errors that occasionally distract the readerFrequent errors that hinder readability15%
MLA Formatting & CitationPerfect MLA formatting; all sources cited correctlyMinor MLA errors; citations mostly correctSeveral MLA errors; citations may be incompleteIncorrect or missing MLA formatting and citations10%

 

Google Gemini Response

Argumentative Essay Grading Rubric

CriteriaExceeds Expectations (A)Meets Expectations (B)Approaches Expectations (C)Below Expectations (D)Unsatisfactory (F)Weight
Clarity and Strength of ThesisThesis is exceptionally clear, precise, and highly arguable, presenting a sophisticated and original position on the topic.Thesis is clear, arguable, and effectively articulates a position on the topic.Thesis is present but may lack some clarity, specificity, or argumentative depth.Thesis is unclear, too broad, or merely states a fact rather than an arguable position.No clear thesis statement or thesis is irrelevant to the prompt.20%
Use of Evidence and SupportIncorporates a wide range of highly credible and relevant evidence that is expertly integrated and thoroughly analyzed to provide compelling support for all claims.Incorporates credible and relevant evidence that effectively supports claims with appropriate integration and analysis.Uses some relevant evidence, but may lack sufficient scholarly sources or evidence may be less effectively integrated or analyzed.Evidence is sparse, irrelevant, or lacks credibility. Claims are largely unsupported or merely summarized.No evidence or irrelevant evidence is used.25%
Organization and CoherenceEssay demonstrates exceptional organization with a logical and sophisticated progression of ideas. Paragraphs are well-developed and transitions are seamless.Essay is well-organized with a clear and logical flow of ideas. Paragraphs are developed and transitions are used effectively.Essay shows some organization, but flow may be occasionally interrupted. Paragraphs may lack development or transitions may be weak.Organization is weak and difficult to follow. Paragraphs are underdeveloped or lack clear focus.Essay lacks discernible organization and is difficult to comprehend.20%
Engagement with CounterargumentsSkillfully addresses multiple opposing viewpoints with thorough and insightful responses, showing a nuanced understanding of the issue.Addresses opposing viewpoints with clear and logical responses that strengthen the overall argument.Addresses some opposing viewpoints, but responses may be superficial or lack sufficient counter-argumentation.Opposing viewpoints are briefly mentioned without adequate response or are ignored.Fails to address any opposing viewpoints.10%
Grammar, Style, and MechanicsWriting is virtually error-free. Demonstrates sophisticated vocabulary and sentence structure, enhancing readability and impact.Writing is largely free of errors. Demonstrates clear and appropriate language and sentence structure.Writing contains some noticeable errors that occasionally distract from meaning.Frequent errors significantly impede readability and comprehension.Numerous and pervasive errors make the essay unintelligible.15%
MLA Formatting and CitationFlawless adherence to MLA format for essay formatting, in-text citations, and Works Cited page.Correct MLA formatting with only minor, infrequent errors.Attempts MLA formatting, but includes several errors that detract from presentation.Inconsistent or incorrect application of MLA format in multiple areas.Fails to apply MLA formatting; citations are missing or improperly done.10%
Word CountEssay meets the 1,200–1,500 word requirement.Essay is slightly outside the 1,200–1,500 word range.Essay is significantly shorter or longer than required.Essay is substantially shorter or longer than required.Essay is far from the specified word count.N/A